2014 Transparency Report

July to December 2014

We believe it’s critical for our users to know about when and how governments ask us for their information. That’s why, since 2012, we’ve published information about the government requests we receive for user information and how we respond to them.

We’re constantly iterating on how we can build this report so that it’s the most informative and useful for our users. For the first time, this report now lists the non-U.S. countries from which we received legal process. People all over the world use Dropbox and we’re committed to informing and protecting all of our users, no matter where they live.

This report also includes additional granularity around how we respond to the government data requests we receive. When we apply our Government Data Request Principles to every request we receive, we look at how many accounts are listed in each piece of legal process (whether a subpoena, search warrant, or court order). Some only identify a single account, whereas others identify tens of accounts in a single request. Our report now includes how we respond to government data requests by the accounts requested, rather than simply by the number of legal process received.

We remain committed to giving notice to users whose data is being sought. In doing so, we reveal what information the government is requesting and when we will provide it and offer the user a chance to object to the production of this information if they don’t believe the government has legal justification to seek it. We will always provide notice unless we are legally prohibited by a valid court order or a state law that specifically prohibits notice.

Search warrants

What Dropbox received
Number of search warrants
Accounts listed in warrants
137
260
How Dropbox responded
To each warrant
To each account listed
Does not exist
17
104
Content and non-content produced
113
149
Notice provided
39
49
No information provided
7
7

Subpoenas

What Dropbox received
Number of subpoenas
Accounts listed in subpoenas
116
758
How Dropbox responded
To each subpoena
To each account listed
Does not exist
4
112
Content produced
0
0
Non-content produced
106
640
Notice provided
37
129
No information provided
6
6

Court orders

What Dropbox received
Court orders
2
How Dropbox responded
Account(s) did not exist
0
Content provided
0
Non-content provided
2
Notice provided
2
No information provided
0

National security requests

National Security Process received
0-249
Accounts affected
0-249

Non-United States requests

Non-United States requests
  • Australia — 1
  • Brazil — 1
  • Germany — 5
  • Finland — 1
  • France — 5
  • India — 1
  • Italy — 2
  • Malta — 1
  • Spain — 1
  • United Kingdom — 2
20
Accounts affected
0

Beyond the numbers

We know that the numbers themselves only tell part of the story, so we also wanted to highlight some additional details to provide a more complete picture.

  • Governments continue to request that we not notify users of requests for their data, even when there is no legal basis for the requests. We received 71 such requests between July and December 2014 and responded by informing the requesting agency of our policy to always provide notice unless prohibited by a valid court order (or equivalent).
  • All requests for content information were accompanied by a search warrant, which is the legal standard that Dropbox requires.
  • We observed a noticeable uptick in the number of accounts identified in the subpoenas we received, which we’ve attributed to three subpoenas that requested non-content information for a large number of accounts. Because we’re committed to pushing back against overbroad requests, we scrutinized each of these subpoenas upon receipt. We validated that the subpoenas, although directed at numerous accounts, were narrowly targeted to specific individuals as part of legitimate investigations.
  • We provided non-content information in response to one emergency disclosure request. We evaluated this request for compliance with 18 U.S.C. 2702 (c)(4), which sets forth the legal standard for emergency disclosures.
  • In three separate instances, we received government data requests that were addressed to the wrong company and sought data about users on those services instead of Dropbox.
  • We didn’t receive any government requests for information on Dropbox for Business accounts in the last six months.
  • We didn’t receive any government requests seeking the removal of content from Dropbox in the last six months.

Glossary

Types of legal process that Dropbox receives

Subpoenas:  Subpoenas include any legal process from law enforcement where there is no legal requirement that a judge or magistrate review the legal process. Local, state and federal government authorities may use subpoenas in both criminal and civil cases and subpoenas are typically issued by government attorneys or grand juries. We do not produce content information in response to subpoenas.

Search warrants:  Search warrants require judicial review, a showing of probable cause, and must meet specificity requirements regarding the place to be searched and the items to be seized. Search warrants may be issued by local, state or federal governments, and may only be used in criminal cases. In response to valid search warrants, we produce non-content and content information.

Court orders:  Court orders are issued by judges and may take a variety of forms, such as a 2703(d) order under the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, in both civil and criminal cases. In response to court orders, we will not produce content information unless the court order has procedural safeguards equivalent to those of a search warrant.

National security process:  National security process includes National Security Letters (“NSLs”) and orders issued under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (“FISA orders”). Dropbox is not permitted by the US government to report the exact number received.

Non-US requests:  Non-US requests include any formal legal process from a non-US government seeking user data. At this time, we require non-US governments to follow the Mutual Legal Assistance Treaty process or letters rogatory process so that a US court will issue the required US legal process to Dropbox.

Information Dropbox provides in response

Non-content:  When we provide “non-content” information in response to valid legal process, that means we provided subscriber information such as the name and email address associated with the account; the date of account creation and other transactional information like IP addresses. “Non-content” information does not include the files that people store in their Dropbox accounts.

Content:  When we provide “content” information in response to valid legal process, that means we provided the files stored in a person’s Dropbox account, in addition to non-content information.

“No information provided”:  This means that we didn’t provide any information in response to the request for one or more of the following reasons: (1) the request was duplicative of a request that we already responded to; (2) Dropbox objected to the request; (3) law enforcement withdrew the request; or (4) the request failed to specify an account.

“Account did not exist”:  This means that law enforcement specified an account in their request, but that account did not exist.

2014 Transparency Report

January to June 2014

Search warrants

What Dropbox received
Search warrants
120
Accounts identified
174
How Dropbox responded
Account(s) did not exist
14
Content and non-content produced
103
Notice provided
42
No information provided
3

Court orders

What Dropbox received
Court orders
2
Accounts identified
2
How Dropbox responded
Account(s) did not exist
0
Content and non-content produced
0
Notice provided
2
No information provided
0

Subpoenas

What Dropbox received
Subpoenas
109
Accounts identified
280
How Dropbox responded
Account(s) did not exist
16
Content produced
0
Non-content produced
80
Notice provided
47
No information provided
13

National security requests

National Security Process received
0-249
Accounts affected
0-249

Non-United States requests

Non-United States requests
37
Accounts affected
0

2013 Transparency Report

January to December 2013

Search warrants

What Dropbox received
Search warrants
118
Accounts identified
172
How Dropbox responded
Account(s) did not exist
9
Content and non-content produced
104
Notice provided
42
No information provided
5

Court orders

What Dropbox received
Court orders
0
Accounts identified
0
How Dropbox responded
Account(s) did not exist
0
Content and non-content produced
0
Notice provided
0
No information provided
0

Subpoenas

What Dropbox received
Subpoenas
159
Accounts identified
401
How Dropbox responded
Account(s) did not exist
37
Content produced
0
Non-content produced
94
Notice provided
61
No information provided
28

National security requests

National Security Process received
0-249
Accounts affected
0-249

Non-United States requests

Non-United States requests
90
Accounts affected
0

2012 Transparency Report

January to December 2012

United States requests

Requests for user information
87
Accounts specified
164
Response rate
82%

Non-United States Requests

Requests for user information
<20
Accounts specified
<20
Response rate
0%*
*In 2012, Dropbox required data requests to go through the United States judicial system.